42nd International Conference on High Energy Physics (ICHEP 2024)
ICHEP is a prestigious series of international conferences organized by the C11 commission of the
GCCEC sign new collaboration agreement with ATLAS (CERN, Geneva, Switzerland). GCCEC agree to have a responsibility to organize Georgian team and coordinate it in order to contribute in ATLAS software development activity. Georgian team will be built among the GCCEC
Today, GCCEC signed memorandum of cooperation with Georgian Technical University (GTU). Both parties have agreed with joint participation in ATLAS (CERN, Geneva, Switzerland) software development project. GCCEC will provide join team with 3D geometrical CATIA modeling and C++ programming staff,
Mr. Charles C. Young, group leader from SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory at Stanford University has visited GCCEC office at CERN. SLAC has collaborative project with CERN and is responsible for the development of ATLAS cavern background simulation software using FLUGG
ATLAS e-new media devote plot as follow to GCCEC and ATLAS collaboration. “Since the early 2000s, ATLAS has enjoyed a fruitful cooperation with the Georgian CAD/CAM Engineering Centre (GCCEC) which has taken responsibility in managing the huge ATLAS 3D CATIA
Collaborative partners: University of Pittsburgh Considering above stated issues activities as follow are foreseen:
Collaborative partners: Stanford University; SLAC Reliable calculation of cavern background depends on the geometry and material descriptions in the application. There are known deficiencies in the present implementation such as in Barrel End Cap gap region, where the current model does not
There are regions where MC/data discrepancy is substantial. Purpose of this work is having answer does discrepancy comes due to the difference between Geant4 vs CATIA geometry or not. If yes then G4 baseline geometry will be accordingly modified. Execution
Collaborative partners: University of Oxford
Collaborative partners: Nikhef, CERN There are regions where MC/data discrepancy is substantial. Purpose of this work is having answer does discrepancy comes due to the difference between Geant4 vs CATIA geometry or not. If yes then G4 baseline geometry will be accordingly
Collaborative partners: University of Pittsburgh